When writing about trans-specific topics, the focus should be on amplifying the voices of trans people rather than turning them into entertainment stereotypes. Depending on the story’s focus, there may be reliable cisgender (paiksooline) experts, but as a best practice, coverage of trans topics should include more transgender than cisgender experts or interviewees.
Before inviting a cisgender expert to comment, consider the following:
- Does this trans-specific story actually require a cisgender expert?
- Is the cisgender expert objective and qualified to speak on the subject? Has the person previously discussed trans issues in a pathologising, patronising, or bad-faith manner?
- Does the story feature more cisgender than transgender experts?
- Does the inclusion of a cisgender expert shift the focus away from trans people and contribute to stigma?
Whenever possible, give trans people a platform to share their own stories, knowledge, and perspectives. Remember that trans people are experts in many fields. Include them as experts not only on trans-related topics but also in other areas of coverage.
Involving medical professionals in trans-specific stories
Being transgender (transsoolisus) is neither a mental nor a physical illness. Framing it primarily through a medical lens reduces trans people to their bodies and portrays them merely as recipients of medical care. While access to healthcare services is vitally important for trans people, being transgender is not solely a medical matter and should not be represented as one.
It is not necessary to include a medical professional’s approval or commentary on a trans person’s experience, as this is not a condition requiring diagnosis or validation, but rather a part of human gender diversity.
A medical expert’s input is appropriate only when the article focuses specifically on shortcomings within the healthcare system in relation to trans healthcare (transtervishoid).